On Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here

I’ve been away from this blog for a few months–family illnesses to deal with, but they are, for now, dealt with–and I’m back!

I’ve just finished reading Sinclair Lewis’s It Can’t Happen Here.  The novel was written in 1935, using the ambitions of the demagogue Huey Long as its basis.  But, it reads, at times, as if Lewis had used a time machine to come forward to 2017, had taken what is happening now in America, and returned to his own time to write his work. (Of course, one could argue that the more things change, the more they stay the same.  But that would only indicate that Lewis understood something about the weaknesses in the nature of man and in American society that is universal and not unique to his era.)

The book’s nominal protagonist is a mild-mannered, liberal, small town Vermont newspaper owner/editor by the name of Doremus Jessup.  But the true main character of the novel is our society as a whole.  The book uses the novel form as mechanism to present a thinly veiled treatise on the way in which fascism and totalitarianism can happen here.  This use of the novel form seems to have fallen out of fashion in the last half of the 20th century, the concept of what a novel should be and do having narrowed considerably.  But, that is a subject I will address separately in a later post. Today, and for the next several days, I am going to present some quotes from It Can’t Happen Here, which I expect may strike a chord of familiarity with the reader, as they did with me.

Here is the first.  (A number of chapters begin with an excerpted quote from the  fictional book, Zero Hour, by Berzelius Windrip, the demagogic senator who becomes president in the novel.  This one precedes Chapter 11.):

“When I was a kid, one time I had an old-maid teacher that used to tell me, ‘Buzz, you’re the thickest-headed dunce in school.’  But I noticed that she told me this a whole lot oftener than she used to tell the other kids how smart they were, and I came to be the most talked-about scholar in the whole township.  The United States Senate isn’t so different, and I want to thank a lot of stuffed shirts for their remarks about Yours Truly.
Zero Hour, Berzelius Windrip”

 

Some Writers Organizations and What They Do

Some Writers’ Organizations and What They Do:

The Authors Guild:  Traditionally, the Authors Guild represents the interests of book authors.  Amongst member services are:  staff attorneys to review contracts; negotiating tips (about what is realistic); disputes (eg. piracy issues); media liability insurance; free website building; and an author site (for a nominal fee per month).  There are three tiers of membership:  (1) those with an agent contract or a book deal; (2) those who are self-published or freelance; and (3) an emerging writer membership (these are not eligible for contract review).  Currently, the Authors Guild is trying to expand, to look at ways in which it can better serve freelance writers as well as book authors.

The News Guild Formerly the Newspaper Guild, the News Guild represents journalists and other media workers in digital and traditional news organizations in the United States, Puerto Rico, and Canada. This includes reporters, columnists, copy editors, photojournalists, graphic designers, editorial cartoonists and workers in advertising, circulation, business offices and other departments related to print and online publications.

The Writers Guild of America East and The Writers Guild of America West:  The Writers Guild of America represents screenwriters for T.V. and the movies. This is an industry based largely on projects rather than continuing staff where, when a project is completed, the workers must look for the next project.  Thus, the workers in this industry have somewhat in common with freelancers.  The guild has traditionally been a very strong union, providing strong contracts and high minimum pay that has provided a decent living, pensions and health care for is members.  The current challenge is organizing writers for so-called reality shows, which have been hiring non-union writers.

The National Writers Union:  Last but not least is the National Writers Union, which fights the fight for all freelance writers, including academic writers, app content writers,
copywriters, ghostwriters, bloggers, business/technical writers, editors, web content writers, and work-for-hire and contract writers, as well as the kinds of freelancers one usually thinks of (eg. book authors, journalists, etc.).

In addition to providing advice on agency contracts, publication contracts, and disputes with employers, the union defends the writers’ right to control the use and payment for electronic uses of their work.  NWU President Jonathan Tahini, along with other journalists brought the groundbreaking lawsuit against the New York Times, Lexis/Nexis, Time Inc., and other distribution services, for reissuing freelancers’ articles on the Internet without permission or additional compensation.  And NWU’s Publication Clearing House is a way for writers to set payment terms for republication of their work.

Unionism for Freelancers

On Saturday, I attended a panel hosted by the National Writers Union held on the campus of George Washington University.  Representatives of the Author’s Guild, the News Guild, the National Writers Union, and the Writers Guild of America, as well as other union activists, spoke. Amongst the matters discussed were the ways in which employers take advantage of freelance writers, and the difficulty of organizing them to better their situation.

Under existing conditions, freelancers work individually, and in isolation from each other. Major news organizations are getting them to work for next to nothing–in many cases, simply for “exposure.” The writer is expected to be grateful for this “exposure.”  Never mind the rent that needs to be paid. Or putting food on the table.  Or any of the other expenses of living.

Some major newspapers are cutting their staff and relying largely on freelance writers to provide their news coverage.  As an example, one major newspaper apparently puts out a call for an article on a subject.  As many as 800 freelancers submit articles–of which the newspaper will only pick and publish one–and pay as little as $50 for it.  In this way, news coverage is being turned into another version of American Idol.  This is not only bad for the freelancers.  It is bad for news staff who eventually will be entirely eviscerated.  And ultimately, it is bad for the quality of news coverage.

What is the answer? In part, getting freelancers–even those who are new to it and need the “exposure”–to refuse to work for nothing.  This will be easier for them to do if they have the support and advice of a union.  Another component is getting staff who are unionized to include standards protecting freelancers in their contracts. (To refuse to do so because freelancers are seen as competition would be penny wise, pound foolish. Raising the standards for freelancers will make it less likely that media corporations can gain a financial advantage by laying off staff and using freelancers in their place.)  Finally, recognizing that “freelance” no longer refers only to writers.  All individual contract workers are freelance workers.  And if this is corporate America’s current strategy for eliminating fair pay and benefits for those who work for them, we need a new broad model for how to combat that manipulation.

My Literary Year (Goodbye to 2015)

During the Year 2015:

–I was one of three head jurors for the regional competition for the Scholastic Arts and Writing Awards.

–I began writing reviews for the Washington Independent Review of Books. (My very first review, of Tesla, A Portrait with Masks, by Vladimir Pištalo, was one of the five most popular reviews for February 2015.)

–I read from my work in The Inner Loop reading series.

–I represented the Potomac Review, critiquing writers’ work in the “speed-dating” session of a writers conference held at JHU.

–For three weeks in June, I attended the New School’s Summer Writers’ Colony in New York.  (Colony helpful; New York wonderful–when there was time to do anything in it.  Colony activities went from noon to 8:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday.  But feeling of living in the city, having a purpose other than touristing, was nice.)

–I read and critiqued a memoir for the Arts Club of Washington, D.C., for their Marfield Prize for Non-Fiction.

–I applied for an individual artist’s fellowship from the D.C. Commission of Arts and Humanities.  (Missed it by “that much.” It was awarded to 12; I was number 14.  Close, but no cigar.  Sigh.)

–Last but not least, I completed the final draft (I think) of my newest novel.

A lot of “I”s in this post.  But then, it is titled “MY” Literary year.

Note:  In December, I was quite busy, as is everybody, with the holidays and end of the year tasks.  For my birthday weekend, I met a friend up in New York.  We went to three musicals:  Kinky Boots; A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder; and The Book of Mormon.  Mini reviews:

Kinky Boots:  The plot summary sounds boring, but the musical is anything but.  Lively, funny, and carries a message of acceptance delivered in a way which rings true, not trite. Plus, Wayne Brady, who plays Lola/Simon is AMAZING.

A Gentleman’s Guide to Love and Murder:  A cross between Gilbert and Sullivan operettas and Oscar Wilde’s plays, this musical is set in an earlier era and satirizes the British class system.  The writing, staging and performers are terrific. The two female leads’ voices are wonderfully strong, and their style of singing is more one of purity of voice than the “belting” it out one finds in pop music these days.

The Book of Mormon:  The cast performs ably, and it has its moments, but overall, this play was a disappointment.  The satire of the Mormon religion is gentle and could apply to the evangelical missionary aspect of any religion.  However, the portrayal of the Africans and their situation, though kindly, was steeped in stereotypes.  The jokes based in this made the audience laugh, and maybe that’s all these playwrites  cared about.  But if you’re doing satire, your jokes should be aimed at what you intend to say.  If they intended to promote stereotypes of black people, I don’t like it, but so be it.  On the other hand, cashing in on stereotype just to get a laugh is cheap.  Better to get the laugh playing against stereotype.

This ends my summary of my year, and brings this blog up to date on my December.

Next–2016………………..

Final Catch-Up

July and August:

July is a blur.  I remember that friends visited, but other than that, I must have slept away most of that month–oh, and probably that’s when I read the novel Landfall, by Ellen Urbani, which I was assigned to review for Washington Independent Review of Books.

August was spent reorganizing my writing space, reminding myself of where I was in my various projects, and writing the review.  At this point,  My review has been turned in, edited, should be out soon.  Stay tuned.

Catching Up: Another Small NYC Adventure–Henry Street Settlement House

The first time I headed down to Chinatown, I stepped into Henry Street Settlement Playhouse instead, and got to chat about the settlement house movement with David Garza, Henry Street’s Executive Director.

My father used to tell me about activities at Madison House–one of the settlement houses existing in New York in the early part of the last century. At the time, one could participate in the arts there–theater, dance, writing, painting, etc. (Now, combined with another settlement house to become Hamilton-Madison House, it tends more toward the provision of only basic social services.)  Hearing my father’s stories about the artistic stimulation provided for slum-dwellers in his days living on the Lower East side made me want to learn more about the settlement house movement with a view to how it might be adapted to today’s world.

I noticed Henry Street Settlement House on a map and set out to walk left on Grand street to visit it before heading east to Chinatown.  Fortunately, a native New Yorker directed me to the new Henry Street Settlement House–the playhouse–since the old one is now used as an administrative office and would have required a longer walk on a hot day to no purpose.

When I explained my interest to the two people I found inside, the man–Garza–said to the woman that he’d take care of what I was asking.  And he talked with me for at least 20 minutes, telling me about the current umbrella organization, United Neighborhood Houses, telling me that Hull House (in Chicago) has been closed, and explaining the difficulty of doing now what was done in my father’s day because gentrification has destroyed the cohesiveness that communities had back then.

I was very impressed by Mr. Garza.  Unlike many public faces of organizations, I strongly felt  his sincere concern was for what this movement is trying to do, not for the furtherance of his organization or himself.

I do hope to do research on this subject and write in greater depth about it (not necessarily on my blog).  This visit was meant to be a beginning.  Walking in off the street, I did not expect to get lucky enough to speak with someone at that level, and very much appreciate the time he took to do so.